To a packed Humanities Auditorium, former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich began his remarks on the ages-old dichotomy of politicians vs. principles by presenting the “Dick Morris Paradox.”
The set-up is simply this: To win an election, it seems a politician must side step hot-button issues and instead focus debate on the less sensational, more neutral topics. This way, he does not risk alienating public opinion and a potential vote in his favor. The “Morris Paradox”鈥攏amed for a pollster of the Clinton administration鈥攕uggests that following this formula, the elected politician then becomes ineffectual, winds up stuck on this self-created platform of neutrality, and offers no plan for bettering the democracy.
The other danger, according to Reich, is the politician who lets hubris dictate his actions, standing on his own opinions without regard for the very constituent body that would elect him.
So what, then is the answer? What must a politician do to win an election and be an effective, democratic leader?
With an earnest expression and tone of voice, Reich offered an answer: those vying for political office鈥攁nd those already in power鈥攎ust strive for a balance between neutrality and hubris. Citing Senator John McCain as prime example, Reich stated that a candidate must take a stand on issues, but he must remain willing and open to public opinion, allowing his constituents to guide and shape his actions in office. In essence, politicians and the public they serve must work together to continually improve the current situation, whatever that may be.
But this, too, requires effort on the part of the public to not let government practice political exclusionism in decision-making; the public must participate through debate, self-education, and a basic degree of civic literacy.
“Our government is far from perfect,” noted Reich. “In every aspect of our government we could and should have more emphasis on public debate and public learning, because that is the essence of democracy and is what ultimately enriches the growth of our democracy.”
At the conclusion of Reich’s remarks, he opened the floor for questions鈥攕parking much public debate, and eloquently demonstrating his total commitment to practice what he preached.